SortMyLawSchool | Header Banner
SortMyLawSchool | Header Banner
  1. Home
  2. / Subject
  3. /Taxation

PREMIER CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. V. C.I.T., BOMBAY CITY (1948) XVI ITR 380 (PC)

PREMIER CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. V. C.I.T., BOMBAY CITY (1948) XVI ITR 380 (PC)

FACTS

  • The appellant was the Managing Agent of a company called Marsland Price and Company Limited.
  • Under their agreement, the appellant received remuneration based on a percentage of the annual profits of the company, with a minimum salary guaranteed.
  • The company derived income from various sources, including manufacturing sugar from its own farms and purchased cane.
  • The appellant argued that a portion of their remuneration corresponding to the agricultural income of the company should be exempt from income tax.
  • The lower authorities rejected this claim, and the matter was referred to the High Court.
  • High Court also answered in favour of revenue.
  • Hence, the present appeal in SC against HC judgment.

ISSUE

  • Whether the portion of the appellant's remuneration, corresponding to the agricultural income of the company, qualifies as agricultural income exempt from income tax.

RULE

  • Income does not inherit the character of agricultural income solely based on its source or calculation method unless it falls within the definition of agricultural income in the Income-tax Act. [Correspondence to sec 2 (1A) of IT Act,1961]

HELD

  • In Gopal Saran Narain Singh v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bihar, and Orissa (A. I. R. 1935 P. C. 143): An annuity payable under a contract secured by a charge on agricultural land. The annuity was not considered agricultural income.
  • Nawab Habibulla v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bengal (1942) 70 I. A. 14: A. I. R. 1943 p. c. 20): The case involved remuneration received by the Mutawalli of a wakf (endowment) estate, where it was held that such remuneration was not agricultural income.
  • In the present case, the appellant's remuneration was received for personal services rendered,not directly from agricultural activities.
  • As the remuneration did not fall within the definition of agricultural income under the Act, it was subject to taxation.
  • Therefore, the court concluded that the portion of the appellant's remuneration corresponding to agricultural income of the company was not exempt from income tax.
  • The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the costs.
  • In essence, the court clarified that income must meet the statutory definition of agricultural income to qualify for exemption from taxation, regardless of its source or calculation method.

COMMENTARIES RATIO/NOTE

  • 278.5 Instances of non-agricultural income - The following are held as non-agricultural income:

Annuity - Annual annuity received by a person in consideration of transfer of agricultural land even if it is charged on land, as source of annuity is covenant and not land-Gopal Saran Narain Singh v. CIT [1935] 3 ITR 237 (PC).

Interest on arrears-Interest on arrears of rent payable in respect of agricultural land as itis neither rent nor revenue derived from land-CIT v. Kamakhya Narain Singh [1948] 16 ITR 325 (PC)